Brights News Feed

Dr Evan Harris MP (Lib Dem), Frank Dobson MP (Lab) and David Wilshire MP (Con) have tabled an amendment that would effectively abolish Britain’s archaic blasphemy law. The vote is tomorrow.

From New Humanist:

A letter published in today’s Daily Telegraph makes the case for repealing the law: “As the Law Commission acknowledged in 1985, when it recommended repeal, it is uncertain in scope, but lack of intention is no defence, and the law is unlimited in penalty.

This, together with its chilling effect on free expression and its discriminatory impact, leaves it in clear breach of human rights law. In the end, no one is likely to be convicted under it.”

The letter is signed by a host of honorary associates and distinguished supporters of the Rationalist Association, the BHA and the NSS, including Richard Dawkins, RA President Jonathan Miller, philosopher and regular New Humanist contributor AC Grayling, historian David Starkey and author Philip Pullman. It’s even been signed by former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey, with the letter pointing out that “the Church of England no longer opposes its abolition on principle”.

The NSS point their members and subscribers to www.theyworkforyou.com where you can write to your MP in support of the amendment. The BHA have a specific “Write to your MP” page with a pre-set message about the law. Don’t delay! MPs will vote on the amendment as early as tomorrow.

As a special Christmas treat the Brights News Feed has, with ironically Easter-like symbolism, spontaneously risen from the dead.

Despite for a while receiving a growing amount of traffic, the editor withdrew from regular posting almost by accident, and other contributors with similarly busy lives have also failed to satiate your news hunger.

BrightsOnline.net will be undergoing an overhaul in the next few months aimed at making regular management easier for editors, as well as providing more routes for collaboration and contribution from all visitors.

In the meantime, in lieu of a season greet from BrightsOnline.net, here are two thoughtful mid-winter messages, both aimed at the widespread “demonology” which regards secularists as rabidly anti-Christmas, a major theme in the British press this year.

• The President’s Mid-Winter Message — Terry Sanderson, President of the National Secular Society (UK)
• Sorry to disappoint, but it’s nonsense to suggest we want to ban Christmas — Polly Toynbee, President of the British Humanist Association

Links to “mid-winter” messages from other secularist figures from anywhere in the world would be welcome (use the comments below).

Via FaithInSociety, the blog of Ekklesia thinker Simon Barrow, comes this interesting segment on what the man almost always referred to as “gay bishop Gene Robinson” said to the Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams recently, in a challenge to Lambeth Palace’s equivocating position in the middle of the gay rights debate which is dividing the Anglican Communion.

A little while ago, in the only time that the Archbishop of Canterbury ever deigned to see me, we were having a little “chat”, and at one point in our conversation, he was explaining to me that, actually what The Episcopal Church should have done prior to electing and consecrating me, was that we should have figured all this out theologically and intellectually… We should have come to a common mind, and then passed canons and and then done this thing. And I said to him with as much respect as I could, “Your Grace, it seems to me that all of the great steps that has taken, have been as a result of our doing the right thing, and only then, “thinking” our way to what we did. It’s not the other way around. I mean, if we had waited for instance in this country for everyone to have been on the same page about civil rights, there would still be separate drinking fountains, wouldn’t there? And if we had waited until women were valued as equal and full members of society and the human race, for goodness sakes, all of that discrimination would still exist.”

The Anglican Bishop of Carlisle, recently maligned in the media for comments to the effect that the UK’s current bout of flooding was God’s punishment for society tolerating homosexuality, attempted to deny that he had said any such thing today.

But judge for yourself…

He [Bishop of Carlisle, Graham Dow] said: “I did not say that the Yorkshire floods were God’s action or because of recent legislation.

“Sadly, that was what was written. The way I see it is that all through Scripture - from Genesis 3, through Noah’s flood, the period of Old Testament kingship, right through to Revelation - God views life as a whole; that is, our morality and the health of the land are all one piece.

“The land is not neutral to us; it is God’s, and for us to steward. If we want to enjoy its fruits then we must live God’s way. That is the message all through Scripture.”

The Bishop said: “Of course we know that disasters have physical causes; but I believe that at such times we also do well to ask questions about our morality, as the book of Revelation does.”

(From the Bishop’s local newspaper.)

Echoing comments made by “conservative” US figures in the aftermath of the New Orleans flooding, several Church of England bishops have made extraordinary comments (for a relatively sane and liberal denomination) blaming the swathe of localized flash flooding across the UK on modern lifestyle, modern power structures, and of course, the modern “witch” (i.e. gay people).

The Telegraph article is worth reading in full — although it’s not clear where, or why these (obviously very recent) comments have been made, perhaps they were solicited individually? — but here are some choice quotes.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Catholic hierarchy has in the last few months raised criticism in Scotland, South America and in Italy due to increased “moral” or political meddling over various issues. Its most recent act of pontification (as it were) is over Amnesty International’s refusal to concur with the papacy’s demands on abortion policy. The president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Cardinal Renato Martino, last week encouraged Catholics to withdraw support from Amnesty because the organization advocates the decriminalization of abortion in cases where rape or abuse for example have taken place.

The Cardinal said “By pushing for the decriminalization of abortion as part of their platform, Amnesty International has disqualified itself as a defender of human rights”, and he suggested that Catholics should withdraw financial support from the internationally respected human rights lobby group.

Interestingly the backlash has come not only from Amnesty, and other human rights campaigners, and secularists concerned about undue religious intervention in humanitarian matters, but from many ordinary Catholics increasingly disenfranchised from the hierarchy. Ekklesia, for example, carries a typical response from one Catholic.

Read the rest of this entry »

Philosopher A. C. Grayling famously believes that the current upsurge in religious news coverage, protest, and renewed political assertion, is a symptom of decline: religion is in its “death throes”.

This week he twisted the knife, exploring the responses to the recent wave of successful secularist publishing (”Tome truths“). Basically, he makes a fairly convincing case that the backlash of protest doth protest too loudly.

Read the rest of this entry »

You’re the head of the worldwide Anglican Communion. One of your denominations in the US has gone ahead and consecrated a gay bishop, spakring worldwide controversy, without the full backing of the wider Church. Another of your denominations in Nigeria has protested so vehemently that it has helped the “conservative” (anti-gay) element in the other denomination to break away and form a new denomination. The once-a-decade conference for the whole Communion is next summer and will melt-down if both parties are present.

What do you do?

You refuse to invite either the legitimately consecreated gay bishop, Gene Robinson, nor the head of the new Convocation of Anglicans in North America, Martyn Minns.

Will the maneuveur appease the critics on either side, or will it please no one?

Read the rest of this entry »

Renowned Anglican theological college, Wycliffe Hall, Oxford University (UK) “is in chaos following a barrage of resignations, forcing a crisis meeting of the governing body to limit the damage to the college’s reputation… From September 2007, Wycliffe Hall will have lost all its best loved and most respected staff members. [Principal Richard] Turnbull will replace them all with conservative evangelicals. More than half the teaching staff have resigned this year. Most will not be replaced in time for the opening of the next academic year…the college will not be capable of teaching its regular curriculum.”

The above text has been circulated to all remaining members of staff at the college. Since Richard Turnball’s appointment in the top job his alleged attempts to swing the college’s theological stance sharply in the conservative evangelical direction, especially with regard to homosexuality and the ordination of women priests, have led to allegations of bullying and intimidation, followed by a slew of resignations, and an alleged attempt to quash the concerns of radio personality Elaine Storkey which has now backfired in the extreme.

According to the Guardian:

The dispute appears to mirror splits in worldwide Anglicanism - and the Church of England - over theology and homosexuality, which have been aggressively led by conservative evangelical groups.

Dr Turnbull denies being a member of conservative evangelical pressure groups, although he did sign a covenant launched last December by leaders of such groups threatening to stop associating with more liberal churches and reject the authority of bishops they disagree with.

A 17-year-old woman from Ireland known only as Miss D had been told by the Health Service Executive (HSE) that she needed permission to travel abroad because she was seeking an abortion, which is against the law under almost all circumstances in Ireland, where many political and legal debates retain heavy Catholic influence. Miss D is four months pregnant and the foetus has anencephaly and will not survive long after birth. Even this does not constitute legal ground for abortion in Ireland.

Today the High Court ruled that the HSE’s decision that Miss D could not travel abroad for an abortion was entirely without merit and that no such law restricting her right to travel existed. Mr Justice Liam McKechnie also rebuked the HSE for trying to shoehorn her case into a model which they (falsely) believed necessary in order for her to travel abroad — they had advised her to claim that she was suicidal. The Justice praised Miss D’s moral stance of refusing to comply with the request and her courage in the face of her ad hoc travel ban.

Also see RTE News.

UPDATE (11 May): And Joan Bakewell has an astute comment piece in the Independent.